7.
Saddam had gone too far (Kuwait's
job to keep Iran and Iraq from
controlling the Persian Gulf entry).
8.
The Gulf War is successful but
Bush (I), now President, doesn't
go into Baghdad. Why? All the
experts know that our artificial
country would break apart if the
Baath Party is overthrown.
Fast
forward a decade, another Bush
is President and he wants to avenge
his father, so:
9. We invade, Saddam is captured,
and the hitherto victims of Saddam's
control, the Shiites, demand his
head.
10.
HOWEVER, the world community has
matured to the point where the
rule of law is replacing rag-tag
vengeance. Saddam Hussein is to
go to the International Criminal
Court where he is to be tried
for crimes against humanity -
LEGALLY and with DUE PROCESS of
LAW.
However,
the United States can't let this
happen.
A. The U.S. fears our leaders,
having done such evil, will be
hauled before the ICC thus we
can't recognize the court; therefore
Saddam can't go where he belongs.
B.
A legitimate trial would reveal
the U.S.'s part in this "cleptorama."
The answer:
Give
Saddam to his adversaries, hold
a sham trial and let the Shiites
have revenge. No justice for the
100,000 plus victims, no exploring
the evidence or hearing testimony,
NO JUSTICE for the other perpetrators,
just unlawful and malice
murder.
It
for worked for David now it's
worked for us - what a shame -
For God's Sake!